Duplicate listings
Conflicting or copied rental ads
Rental scams can use real addresses, real property photos, convincing messages, and legitimate-looking payment requests. For $19, we review the information you provide, look for inconsistencies and warning signs, and give you a plain-English Rental Risk Review.
Review My Rental — $19
Before you send a security deposit, application fee, first month’s rent, or another payment, it may be worth taking one more look.
Conflicting or copied rental ads
Rent that appears unusually low
Advertiser details that do not align
Property images appearing elsewhere
Money requested before viewing
Stories designed to avoid meeting
Pressure to send money quickly
Owner or company cannot be verified
One payment. No account or subscription required.
Pay $19 securely through Stripe.
After payment, our secure intake form opens automatically.
We research the property, listing, advertiser information, and warning signs.
Your plain-English report is emailed to you, usually within 24 hours.
See how findings, unanswered questions, and practical next steps fit together.
Illustrative examples only. All addresses, amounts, messages, and findings below are fictional. These are not customer reports or actual investigations. Your review will reflect the information available for your rental.
123 Maple Street (fictional address)
The supplied information contains conflicting advertiser details and a request for payment before a viewing. In this example, those concerns support a high-risk assessment. They do not establish who is responsible or prove fraud.
Example evidence: The same photos and address appear in a second listing at $1,850 per month with a different contact.
What it means: The discrepancy needs an explanation. Copied photos alone do not establish which listing is authorized.
Example evidence: The sender claims to own the home, while the comparison listing names a management company. No evidence connecting the sender to that company was supplied.
What it means: The sender’s authority to offer this rental remains unverified.
Example evidence: Messages request a $1,525 transfer to reserve the home before any viewing and say keys will be sent after payment.
What it means: Payment pressure combined with unverified authority raises concern.
We could not establish who controls the rental, whether either listing is current, or whether the payment recipient is authorized. No owner or manager was contacted in this fictional example.
This sample illustrates the report format, not a finding about a real property or person. A Rental Risk Review considers available information at the time of review and cannot guarantee a rental or payment is legitimate.
Back to sample reports48 Cedar Lane, Unit B (fictional address)
The listing details are consistent across the supplied material, but the sender’s connection to the named management company is unresolved. The available evidence is insufficient to reach a lower-concern assessment.
Example evidence: The address, photos, and advertised rent match the company listing included in the example.
What it means: Consistency is useful, but a sender could copy a legitimate listing.
Example evidence: The sender uses a personal email address that does not appear on the company’s website.
What it means: This does not prove wrongdoing, but the company should confirm the sender’s role through a separately obtained contact.
Example evidence: The sender requests a $75 application fee before a viewing. The company listing does not describe this fee or name the proposed payment recipient.
What it means: The fee and payment destination need confirmation; the amount alone does not determine risk.
The sender’s employment or authorization, current availability, and the legitimacy of the application link and fee remain unverified. No payment or application was submitted.
This sample illustrates the report format, not a finding about a real property or person. A Rental Risk Review considers available information at the time of review and cannot guarantee a rental or payment is legitimate.
Back to sample reports206 Oak Court (fictional address)
The materials in this example show consistent property and company details, a viewing offered before payment, and written payment instructions. Fewer concerns were identified within the review’s scope. This is not an approval to pay or a guarantee of legitimacy.
Example evidence: The address, rent, and photos align with the independently located company listing in the example.
What it means: No discrepancy was identified in these materials; availability can still change.
Example evidence: The correspondence uses the same company domain as the independently located website.
What it means: Matching details reduce one concern but do not authenticate an individual message or rule out a compromised account.
Example evidence: The written process offers a viewing and lease review before a deposit, with a named company payment recipient.
What it means: The reviewed messages contain no demand for an immediate transfer. The actual recipient and terms still need confirmation.
We did not inspect the property, authenticate the lease, confirm title, or verify control of the receiving account. The review does not establish that the transaction will proceed as described.
This sample illustrates the report format, not a finding about a real property or person. A Rental Risk Review considers available information at the time of review and cannot guarantee a rental or payment is legitimate.
Back to sample reportsA scammer does not need to invent a house. They can copy a real address, real photographs, and even the name of a legitimate company. The false part may simply be the person asking you to send money.
$19 before sending a $1,000+ deposit can be an inexpensive second opinion.
Social Security numbers, bank information, credit or debit card numbers, passwords, driver’s licenses, passports, or other highly sensitive identity information.
We do not need these items to perform the review.
Most reviews are completed within 24 hours after we receive all information needed for the review.
No. We evaluate available information and identify risk indicators, inconsistencies, and items that should be independently verified.
Your report explains what we could establish, what we could not establish, and what you should verify before sending money.
No. We do not perform background checks, tenant screening, legal services, financial advice, or title searches.
You may still submit the case. If you believe you were defrauded, contact your bank or payment provider immediately and consider reporting the matter to law enforcement.
No. Purchase one review and submit your information without creating an account.
Slow down, verify the details, and get a second opinion before sending money.